One more - APT was great for our purposes since we wanted a plain text release note in email as well as a html version - with APT we need to update just a single source file.
Kalle On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:15 AM, EJ Ciramella<[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks everyone for the debate for me to watch - I just kinda sat back > and ate popcorn while you guys battled it out. > > Here are what I've captured: > > 1 - people like apt for its simplicity (me too) - I can see how easy it > would be to diff various versions in your SCM tool. You'd not see tags, > just the changes. Leads to VERY compact documentation. > 2 - people leverage xdoc and fml for things they need beyond what apt > can perform > > I still see very little reason to use html other than "comfort" level > here. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
