Ah, switch the aggregator to do aggregate-jar and it all works now
(afaict). Nice.
Sam Barnett-Cormack wrote:
David Hoffer wrote:
I don't know about running from the command line...we have our CI system
auto deploy javadocs/source jars to our internal repo so IDE's get this
integrated with the binaries. This is the functionality I was looking
for.
Well, I'm getting the website combined javadocs, and I'm getting the
per-module jar'ed javadocs, but not the combined jar'ed javadocs,
because of the message below (afaict). Anyone know how I'd bring this to
the attention of the devs of the maven-javadoc-plugin?
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Sam Barnett-Cormack <
[email protected]> wrote:
David Hoffer wrote:
No any call to install or deploy will build it. This isn't required
but
we
do wrap the build section in a profile so we only do this on the CI
system...as this takes a while.
Well, that works very well for putting the aggregated javadoc on the
generated site (once I configured it to generate a site), but the
attempt to
javadoc:jar gives me:
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Building ASN.1 Java Implementation
[INFO] task-segment: [javadoc:jar]
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[WARNING] DEPRECATED [aggregate]: As of version 2.5, use the goals
<code>javadoc
:aggregate</code> and
<code>javadoc:test-aggregate</code> instead.
[INFO] [javadoc:jar {execution: default-cli}]
[INFO] Not executing Javadoc as the project is not a Java
classpath-capable
package
The deprecation I can deal with later, but the not-running-javadoc is a
pain.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Sam Barnett-Cormack <
[email protected]> wrote:
David Hoffer wrote:
This works for us, try this in your parent pom:
When running this, does it need site:site running to build the
javadoc
before running a build that'll generate the jar?
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.5</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>attach-javadocs</id>
<goals>
<goal>jar</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
<reporting>
...
<plugin>
<!--Provides javadocs-->
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.5</version>
<configuration>
<aggregate>true</aggregate>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</reporting>
-Dave
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Sam Barnett-Cormack <
[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
My first maven project, plain JavaSE. I want to build javadoc jars,
independent of any site - I'm trying to get that working as well,
but
for
now I'm considering them separately.
For organisation purposes, I've split my work into several projects,
which
I've now made modules of a parent. Creating a source bundle with
source:aggregate (having also done source:jar-no-fork on the
modules)
was
easy. Now I want to create a combined javadoc bundle, and that's not
proving
easy.
I've successfully got javadoc:jar running on the modules. However,
javadoc:aggregate-jar on the parent does nothing, as far as I can
tell.
Now, since I'm using m2eclipse, I can happily create a javadoc by
running
the eclipse javadoc builder over multiple projects, but I'd rather
integrate
with maven if at all possible. Anyone have any ideas?
--
Sam Barnett-Cormack
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--
Sam Barnett-Cormack
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--
Sam Barnett-Cormack
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--
Sam Barnett-Cormack
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
