Tamas, could explain "MRMs + grouping + mirrorOf" or send a link?
2009/9/28 Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]>: > Sorry for thread hijack, but was not able to resist... > > Another thing to think about, since it's adoption: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Stephen Connolly < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> We do not allow <repository> definitions in pom files for a good reason. >> >> > This seemed as a good idea, but.... think about it. > > Why would you _not_ put reposes in POMs? Because they will be _burned_ in to > your POMs forever and your URLs may change down the road? > > Why is this better: > > * having repository defs in POMs, thus providing at least some usable info > that a developer may use as starting point and google it up/search/look for > it (where it went, what it was, etc) > > then: > > * providing _no_ useful information in POMs for future generations? Having > no trace in your _build_ about needed reposes... > > Ah yes, _both_ cases are easily handled by MRMs + grouping + mirrorOf, but > in 2nd case, the one building may only shoot in the dark, you did not > provide _any_ information from what did you build your stuff. > > Think about it. > ~t~ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
