Babptiste, I understand that this is a good solution for users who work for a comany that service a managed repo. First i didn't get the difference between the two deployed jta versions, but thanks to Anders now I know...
Regards, Johan. 2009/11/4 Baptiste MATHUS <[email protected]> > Well, no. The generic solution is to put a maven repository manager inside > your own repository. This way, you'll be able to handle configuration very > simply without depending on public repositories only. It just doesn't > scale. > Sometimes, you want things that'll never exist publicly. As Anders > explained, jta is to be retrieved manually (read the pom). > For instance, that's what we did inside our MRM. I guess this "limitation" > kind of comes from the license. > > And putting a mrm between is the almost only solution to handle it > properly. > Even apart from the fact that without a mrm between your developers and the > net, your company will hit central repository (and others) thousands of > times instead of just once... > The corresponding link: > > http://www.sonatype.com/people/2008/08/be-a-good-maven-citizen-dont-scrape-the-whole-damn-central-repository/ > > Cheers. > > 2009/11/4 Johan Vogelzang <[email protected]> > > > I do not see why this is correct in central. > > The more recent version 1.1 seems to be correctly deployed to central > see: > > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/javax/transaction/jta/1.1 > > You can see the jar file there. > > > > We do not manage this dependency ourselfs. Jta is a transitive > dependency, > > that comes with hibernate 3.2.5.ga. And depending on the java.net Maven > > repo > > is not a generic solution, becouse every developer or everry project need > > to > > take manualy steps to configure this repo. > > > > Regards, > > Johan. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2009/11/4 Anders Hammar <[email protected]> > > > > > It's correct in central. You can get it from there, as it states in the > > > pom. > > > You need to download it manually. But you've found in at java.net, so > > use > > > that. Or some other implementation that is available at central (I > guess > > > there is a geronimo one). > > > > > > /A > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 15:56, Johan Vogelzang < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Anyway it seems that this artifact in not correctly deployed (or > > > > synchronized). > > > > > > > > Johan. > > > > > > > > 2009/11/4 Anders Hammar <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > I don't think it has ever been there. Are you sure that it has been > > > > > removed? > > > > > > > > > > /A > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 14:10, Johan Vogelzang < > > > [email protected] > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > Today I discovered that jta-1.0.1B.jar is removed from the > central > > > > Maven > > > > > > repository. > > > > > > See: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/javax/transaction/jta/1.0.1B > > > > > > Causing our builds to fail. > > > > > > > > > > > > It still exists in > > > > > > http://download.java.net/maven/2/javax/transaction/jta/1.0.1B > > > > > > What steps can I take to tackle this issue? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Johan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Johan Vogelzang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Johan Vogelzang > > > > > > -- > Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net > Sauvez un arbre, > Mangez un castor ! > -- Johan Vogelzang
