Well, that's interesting - here's the thing - if you use opensource, community edition version of jboss, then you can depend on the jboss repository.
If, however, you depend on the commercial version, patches (to both files and jars) are delivered in a different fashion (from what I can tell). Also, all the services that are available as part of the default server installation example are used in about 20 different projects here. I'd prefer creating a single artifact that contains both duplicated/shared component configuration AND binaries versus multiple jar installation and a secondary artifact for the component configuraiton. Thank you for the feedback though, the real answer to this question seems to be that dependencies are verified during the validate phase and if you bind an "unpack-dependencies" to validate, it binds it to the end of the goal (which is too late for our purposes). -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anders Hammar Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 12:58 PM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: system scoped dependencies are attempted to be downloaded Don't think it's a bug, it's you using it the wrong way. As I understand you, you have a dependency to some archive which you unpack. In the same project you have a system scope dependency which points at some jar that gets unpacked from the dependency above. Don't think that would work and I frankly don't understand what you're doing. That is not the Maven way. You should add the jar (artifact) extracted from the archive to you (corporate) repository instead. /Anders On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 18:07, EJ Ciramella <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry - and thank you! > > Any suggestions or is this (confirmed as a) a bug? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Anders Hammar > Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 2:07 AM > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: system scoped dependencies are attempted to be downloaded > > Ok. In the future, it would be great if you include this kind of info when > you ask about a problem. You need to provide all info for us to be able to > help. > > /Anders > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 23:47, EJ Ciramella <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Yeah, we have a pretty out-of-the-ordinary build process using > > jboss/atg/etc. > > > > Try this - zip up any jar and try to both unpack that AND put that jar as > a > > dependency with a system scope. > > > > This won't work. It will try to resolve the dependency and fail so it > > never unpacks the zip. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > Behalf Of Anders Hammar > > Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 4:20 PM > > To: Maven Users List > > Subject: Re: system scoped dependencies are attempted to be downloaded > > > > Sorry, I don't know. > > I take it your setup is a little bit more complicated than your initial > > posts indicated? > > > > /Anders > > > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 22:12, EJ Ciramella <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hmm - here's a question - if the jar I'm looking for exists inside a > zip > > > file that needs to be downloaded, unpacked and then and only then will > > > systemPath actually point at a jar - will that fail? > > > > > > When does dependency resolution happen - at the validate stage? If so, > > the > > > zip won't be downloaded and unpacked by then resulting in a systemPath > > that > > > doesn't exist. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > > Behalf Of Anders Hammar > > > Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 3:41 PM > > > To: Maven Users List > > > Subject: Re: system scoped dependencies are attempted to be downloaded > > > > > > And you have tried the very simplest project, containing just the > > > dependencies section with just this dependency? And no parent pom which > > > could hide something not obvious. For example, use the quickstart > > > archetype. > > > Also, have you tried it in a different environment (computer)? > > > If that still reproduces the issue, I suggest you create a jira and > > attach > > > that project. > > > > > > /Anders > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 21:33, EJ Ciramella <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > We're not using a version range. The numbers I'm speaking of below > is > > > the > > > > range of maven 2 versions I tried and had this problem. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Wayne Fay [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 3:29 PM > > > > To: Maven Users List > > > > Subject: Re: system scoped dependencies are attempted to be > downloaded > > > > > > > > > It's simple - if you have a dependency with a system scope, maven > > 2.0.9 > > > - > > > > 2.2.1 tries looking up that dependency in any repos you may have > > mapped. > > > > > > > > > > Shouldn't it just skip that part? > > > > > > > > What happens when you change the version range to a fixed value eg > > > > >2.1.3< or >[2.1.3]<? Or if you remove the version stanza entirely > > > > since it does not apply to system scoped artifacts? > > > > > > > > Wayne > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
