I did read the link. I thought Jason was saying Maven's metadata isn't "complete" -- that the classifier isn't included in the repository's description of the snapshot deployment.
Paul On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Dan Tran <[email protected]> wrote: > I dont have a solution, Jason however did propose an alternative > metadata handling ( see the discussion link ) > > 0D > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> wrote: >> So are you asking for the classifier to be part of the snapshot metadata? >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Dan Tran <[email protected]> wrote: >>> of course, we must use classifier per platform. >>> >>> see this link for other fundamental issues when not using non-unique >>> snapshot >>> >>> http://old.nabble.com/Multi-Platform-snapshots-td25295999.html >>> >>> -Dan >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> If you are creating artifacts for different environments, you can use >>>> custom classifiers. I have done this. This will add a suffix to your >>>> artifacts. >>>> >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Dan Tran <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> How about an alternative solution to replace that feature? >>>>> >>>>> -D >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Dan Tran <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>> According to >>>>>> >>>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+Compatibility+Notes#Maven3.xCompatibilityNotes-NonuniqueSnapshotDeployments >>>>>> >>>>>> "The setting <uniqueVersion>false</uniqueVersion> for a distribution >>>>>> repository has no effect in version 3.x, snapshot artifacts will >>>>>> always be deployed using a timestamped version." >>>>>> >>>>>> This is a huge lost to those projects with multiple profile to build >>>>>> per platform specific. see >>>>>> http://old.nabble.com/Multi-Platform-snapshots-td25295999.html for >>>>>> details >>>>>> >>>>>> For my case, we might be able to go forward with maven 3 ...... >>>>>> >>>>>> Can the dev team put it back? >>>>>> >>>>>> -Dan >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
