Once in a while a forum blindly invites an illiterate into its ranks who bogs down the threads with minced misspellings, incorrect verb tenses and stuttering shifts in narrative. The community tolerates this texting techno-babbler, although, in this grammarian's opinion, all-too-frequently and to its detriment.
You, sir, have committed jest in poor form, literally. Bob Ross wrote: > > nice gafter! > You have used the noun form and yet I see no noun form in your definition. I have amended your definition, thusly. gafter -- v. to assault in writing a person's argument, reasoning or position based upon that person's perceived ignorance of the formal process(es) required to enact or support the argument, reasoning or position; to refute in writing an assertion made by the asserter who is perceived as uninformed in the area in which the refuter is informed. n. a written assault as such. In the future, please see [1] and put down the Twitter! [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parts_of_speech -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Checksum-errors-tp26631414p26635095.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
