It looks like my prev message got stopped because of the attachment... Hi Siegfried, here (http://github.com/stefanofornari/script-maven-plugin) you find what I've done so far. If you think it could make sense, I can set up a git repository until Tomek gives us directions.
NOTES: 1. I have removed the parent section from the pom, I could not find it on any repository 2. I did not change the site yet. Any feedback is welcome. Ste On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Siegfried Goeschl <[email protected]> wrote: > Same here .... :-) > > Stefano Fornari wrote: >> Hi Tomek, >> I think I'll have a first version by tonight. How would you like to >> proceed? Shall I pack the source code and post it to the list? Or do >> you prefer a patch (but keep in mind there will be a lot of changes). >> >> Please let me know. >> Ste >> >> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Tomasz Pik <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Stefano Fornari >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> I needed a plugin to run JavaScript scripts and I ran into >>>> script-maven-plugin. It looks that id does most of what I need, but I >>>> would need to extend it anyway to allow the evaluation of more than >>>> one script. Looking at the documentation and code, I noticed, it seems >>>> a bit outdated and supports BSF 2.x only. >>>> In the JDK 1.6, JSR223 is implemented and provides already the Rhino >>>> JavaScript engine implementation. I was therefore wondering if it >>>> makes sense at all to develop a script-maven-plugin 2.0 that supports >>>> JSR223 and drops support for BSF (who wants to use BSF engines can >>>> keep using 1.0-SNAPSHOT). I would develop such version and contribute >>>> it to the project if Tomasz is fine with it. The alternative is to >>>> develop a separate plugin, but it would be a pity to fragment this >>>> simple mojo. >>>> >>> Yes, go for it. >>> Initially, I've been developing this plugin with groovy in mind >>> and then whole GMaven thing comes... >>> Also, with JDK1.6 being a de facto standard on developer's environments, >>> I think it would be better to use JSR233 instead of BSF. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tomek >>> >>>> What do you think? >>>> >>>> Stefano >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ste >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Ste --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
