Yes, I did mean ibiblio.

I still don't understand why  supposedly the same jar file downloaded at the
--same-- time using maven or a browser
are different. Even if I am getting sent to a different mirror they should
be exactly the same. This is not a case of file corruption, the time stamps
in the jar file are different.

-Rob

On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]>wrote:

> Bilbo.org looks like a spam search site. Did you mean ibiblio?
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Rob Leland <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > I am getting a different jar file and sha1 signature from bilbo.orgmaven
> > repo depending on whether I use maven or a browser.
> >
> > When I manually clear out my local repository for spring-webmvc
> >
> > When I build a project from the command line with maven 2.0.9 I see that
> > the
> > only file downloaded is:
> >
> > Downloading:
> >
> >
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/springframework/spring-webmvc/2.5.6/spring-webmvc-2.5.6.pom
> > 5K downloaded
> > Downloading:
> >
> >
> http://maven.springframework.org/release/org/springframework/spring-webmvc/2.5.6/spring-webmvc-2.5.6.jar
> > 392K downloaded
> >
> > When I look at the spring-webmvc-2.5.6.jar.sha1 downloaded by maven I
> see:
> > f19e2e60721a2fc2111c0d6f95f51f224b9e9883
> >
> > If I go to the same URL on ibiblio.org using my browser and down load
> it:
> > spring-webmvc-2.5.6.jar.sha1 has a value of:
> > fa425355629ce2ce0bfb870849a6b6634f299649
> >
> > When I do a jar file comparison between the one maven downloaded and the
> > one
> > I downloaded with my browser
> > There are 18 files in the jar file that are different including the
> > MANIFEST.MF.
> >
> > I have done this experiment twice and get the same results.
> >
> > I have a version of the spring-webmvc-2.5.6.jar.sha1 and
> > spring-webmvc-2.5.6.jar that I downloaded a year ago,
> > and those files match the version I downloaded with the browser i.e.:
> > fa425355629ce2ce0bfb870849a6b6634f299649
> >
> >
> > What's going on here?
> >
> > Rob Leland
> >
>

Reply via email to