I keep forgetting those links need passwords.  you can
https://guest:@grizzly.dev.java.net/svn/grizzly/trunk/code/modules/utils/pom.xmland
https://guest:@grizzly.dev.java.net/svn/grizzly/trunk/code/pom.xml  instead.

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Justin Lee <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm working on making the grizzly deployments actually work with maven
> (currently we have an involved set of instructions due, in part, to
> java.net's wonderous performance but that's a rant for another time).
>  Given this pom:
> https://grizzly.dev.java.net/svn/grizzly/trunk/code/modules/utils/pom.xml and 
> the command:
>
> mvn -e -DdryRun=$DRYRUN -DautoVersionSubmodules=true
> -DdevelopmentVersion=1.9.19-SNAPSHOT -DreleaseVersion=1.9.19-beta2
> -Dtag=1_9_19_beta2 -DallowTimestampedSnapshots=true
> -DupdateDependencies=false release:clean release:prepare
>
> I get this error:
>
> [INFO] Transforming 'grizzly-project'...
> [INFO] Transforming 'grizzly-lzma'...
> [INFO] Transforming 'grizzly-utils'...
> [INFO] Updating grizzly-lzma to 1.9.19-beta2
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] The version could not be updated: ${grizzly-version}
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Trace
> org.apache.maven.BuildFailureException: The version could not be updated:
> ${grizzly-version}
> at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:715)
>  at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeStandaloneGoal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:569)
> at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:539)
>  at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:387)
> at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegments(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:284)
>  at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:180)
> at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:328)
>  at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:138)
> at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:362)
>  at
> org.apache.maven.cli.compat.CompatibleMain.main(CompatibleMain.java:60)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>  at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:592)
> at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315)
>  at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
> at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430)
>  at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
> Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoFailureException: The version could
> not be updated: ${grizzly-version}
>  at
> org.apache.maven.plugins.release.PrepareReleaseMojo.execute(PrepareReleaseMojo.java:169)
> at
> org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultPluginManager.java:490)
>  at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:694)
> ... 17 more
>
> The problem, it seems, is that we use the property grizzly-version defined
> in the root pom (
> https://grizzly.dev.java.net/svn/grizzly/trunk/code/pom.xml) to specify
> the intermodule dependencies.  Now, I've seen poms that don't specify the
> module versions in the deps but when I try that, the pom fails to validate.
>  So I guess I have two questions:
>
>
>    1. Can we not use the property for the dependency version number like
>    that?  Do we need to hard code the project version?
>    2. How can we eliminate that version entry from the dependency
>    altogether?  That'd be the simplest way, i think, if it works that way.
>
>

Reply via email to