Hi, This question is regarding dependencies and how they are stored in repo1 AND my local repo.
First, on repo1, I noticed that some versions (of projects) contain jars and some do not. For instance: http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/cobertura/cobertura/1.8/ has jars but http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/cobertura/cobertura/1.9rc1/ does not. Just a .pom file exists. Similarly, on my local repo, when I built my project (using a clean local repo), antlr was downloaded. There is no direct dependency on antlr on my project, so I suppose it was pulled in transitively. However, my local repo is missing antlr-2.7.6.jar. All it has is a antlr-2.7.6.pom (and a sha1 file). Note however that repo1 for antlr 2.7.6 does have the jar! http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/antlr/antlr/2.7.6/ Also, the .pom file that does exist does not point to a different location. Sometimes it even has a packaging element specified as 'jar'. Yet there is no jar file. So what decides whether a jar is downloaded to my local repo or not. Why do some projects have just .pom files and others have jars + .pom files? And why did Antlr's .jar not get downloaded to my local repo, instead only antlr-2.7.6.pom was only downloaded? Thanks, Pankaj -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Where-are-there-missing-jars-in-repo1%2C-with-just-.pom-files-instead-tp28287859p28287859.html Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
