I tried this (in my WAR POM):
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
<profiles>
<profile>
<id>unpacking-javascript</id>
<activation>
<activeByDefault>true</activeByDefault>
</activation>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>unpack-javascripts</id>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<artifactItems>
<artifactItem>
<artifactId>sk-javascript-token</artifactId>
<groupId>com.securekey.javascript</groupId>
<version>${project.version}</version>
<classifier>javascript</classifier>
<type>zip</type>
</artifactItem>
</artifactItems>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</profile>
</profiles>
parent POM:
<profiles>
<profile>
<id>unpacking-WSDL</id>
<build>
<plugins>
<!-- unpacking of WSDL dependencies -->
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.1</version>
<inherited>true</inherited>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>unpack-wsdls</id>
<goals>
<goal>unpack</goal>
</goals>
<phase>generate-resources</phase>
<configuration>
<outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}/war/WEB-INF/wsdl</outputDirectory>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</profile>
<profile>
<id>unpacking-javascript</id>
<build>
<pluginManagement>
<plugins>
<!-- unpacking of JAVASCRIPT dependencies -->
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.1</version>
<inherited>false</inherited>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>unpack-javascripts</id>
<goals>
<goal>unpack</goal>
</goals>
<phase>package</phase>
<configuration>
<outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}/war/scripts</outputDirectory>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</pluginManagement>
</build>
</profile>
</profiles>
still no effect, even though the maven-dependency-plugin is now mentioned
twice in the WAR's POM.. hmm, do I have to do the same in the parent POM?
i.e. specify the plugin in the build's plugin management?
\
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Timothy Mcginnis
<[email protected]>wrote:
> Are you defining the plugin in your WAR POM also? Using the
> pluginManagement I believe you also need to call out the use of the plugin
> in the WAR POM, but don't define any of the execution/configuration data,
> that is provided by the pluginManagement in the profile.
>
>
> Profile provides this:
>
> <pluginManagement>
> <plugins>
> ...
> <!-- unpacking of JAVASCRIPT dependencies -->
> <plugin>
> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> <artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
> <inherited>true</inherited>
> <executions>
> <execution>
> <id>unpack-javascripts</id>
> <goals>
> <goal>unpack</goal>
> </goals>
> <phase>package</phase>
> <configuration>
> <outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}/war/scripts</outputDirectory>
> </configuration>
> </execution>
> </executions>
> </plugin>
> </pluginManagement>
>
>
> WAR POM specifies this:
>
>
> <build>
> <plugins>
> <plugin>
> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupid>
> <artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
> </plugin>
> </plugins>
> </build>
>
>
>
> Tim McGinnis
> 717 720-1962
> Web Development
> AES/PHEAA
>
>
>
> From:
> "Shan Syed" <[email protected]>
> To:
> "Maven Users List" <[email protected]>
> Date:
> 05/13/2010 12:51 PM
> Subject:
> Re: inheriting and reusing the same plugin for different purposes? doesn't
> seem to find the right executions
>
>
>
> thanks - how would I set this up?
> I tried to specify two profiles in my parent POM, each with their own
> pluginManagement blocks, containing a maven-dependency-plugin
> configuration,
> and then activated the profile in the WAR projects' POMs, but there is no
> result
>
> I basically want my plugins' meta config stored in the root, and specific
> configs applied in the WAR projects
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Timothy Mcginnis
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > What about using profiles? Define 3 profiles; one for wsdl only, one
> for
> > javascript only, and one for both. Then have the war project activate
> the
> > one it needs.
> >
> > Tim McGinnis
> > 717 720-1962
> > Web Development
> > AES/PHEAA
> >
> >
> >
> > From:
> > "Shan Syed" <[email protected]>
> > To:
> > "Maven Users List" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> > Date:
> > 05/13/2010 09:54 AM
> > Subject:
> > Re: inheriting and reusing the same plugin for different purposes?
> doesn't
> > seem to find the right executions
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks, but the problem is that when I do that, both executions occur,
> > even
> > when I specify inheritance=false.
> >
> > I basically need to use the same plugin for two different purposes,
> > without
> > either of them affecting the other; I tried to specify different
> versions
> > for the mvn dep plugin (i.e. in one block, specify 2.0, and 2.1 for the
> > other), but no dice.
> >
> > Running mvn help:effective-pom on my WAR projects always shows the
> second
> > maven-dependency-plugin configuration from the root POM in the
> > pluginManagement section
> > BUT
> > in the actual plugin block, it shows the following (below)
> > (note the second execution, with not configuration or anything
> associated
> > with it)
> >
> > What is the exact logic for the merging of plugin configs in a
> multimodule
> > project?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > S
> >
> > <plugin>
> > <artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
> > <version>2.1</version>
> > <executions>
> > <execution>
> > <id>unpack-wsdls</id>
> > <phase>generate-resources</phase>
> > <goals>
> > <goal>unpack</goal>
> > </goals>
> > <configuration>
> >
> >
> >
>
> <outputDirectory>C:\dev\sk\sk-saml\sk-saml-web\sk-saml-server\target/war/WEB-INF/wsdl</outputDirectory>
> > </configuration>
> > </execution>
> > <execution>
> > <id>unpack-javascripts</id>
> > </execution>
> > </executions>
> > <configuration>
> > <artifactItems>
> > <artifactItem>
> > <artifactId>sk-javascript-token</artifactId>
> > <groupId>com.securekey.javascript</groupId>
> > <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> > <classifier>javascript</classifier>
> > <type>zip</type>
> > </artifactItem>
> > </artifactItems>
> > </configuration>
> > </plugin>
> >
> > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Kalpak Gadre <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I have never tried declaring the same plugin twice, but you can simply
> > > define more executions in the same plugin declaration like,
> > >
> > > <executions>
> > > <execution>
> > > <id>one</id>
> > > .
> > > .
> > > </execution>
> > > <execution>
> > > <id>two</id>
> > > .
> > > .
> > > </execution>
> > > </executions>
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Kalpak
> > >
> > >
> > > Here's my scenario: I have a large multimodule project whose WARs
> share
> > >> certain dependencies, which are packaged as zips by a few simple
> > >> assemblies
> > >> I wrote.
> > >>
> > >> I am using the maven-dependency-plugin to unpack the contents of
> these
> > >> zips
> > >> into their destination folders in the webapps.
> > >>
> > >> However, to reduce clutter and minimize maintenance, the majority of
> > the
> > >> plugin configuration is in the root POM, like so:
> > >> (note that I am using the same plugin twice for two different reasons
> -
> > is
> > >> this valid?)
> > >>
> > >> <build>
> > >> <pluginManagement>
> > >> <plugins>
> > >> ...
> > >> <!-- unpacking of JAVASCRIPT dependencies -->
> > >> <plugin>
> > >> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> > >> <artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
> > >> <inherited>true</inherited>
> > >> <executions>
> > >> <execution>
> > >> <id>unpack-javascripts</id>
> > >> <goals>
> > >> <goal>unpack</goal>
> > >> </goals>
> > >> <phase>package</phase>
> > >> <configuration>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> <outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}/war/scripts</outputDirectory>
> > >> </configuration>
> > >> </execution>
> > >> </executions>
> > >> </plugin>
> > >> <!-- unpacking of WSDL dependencies -->
> > >> <plugin>
> > >> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> > >> <artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
> > >> <inherited>true</inherited>
> > >> <executions>
> > >> <execution>
> > >> <id>unpack-wsdls</id>
> > >> <goals>
> > >> <goal>unpack</goal>
> > >> </goals>
> > >> <phase>generate-resources</phase>
> > >> <configuration>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
> <outputDirectory>${project.build.directory}/war/WEB-INF/wsdl</outputDirectory>
> > >> </configuration>
> > >> </execution>
> > >> </executions>
> > >> </plugin>
> > >> </plugins>
> > >> </pluginManagement>
> > >> </build>
> > >>
> > >> Some WARs need the WSDLs, some need the javascript files, while
> others
> > >> don't
> > >> need either - it will be up to the developers creating those
> projects.
> > >>
> > >> Here is an example usage in one of the WARs (note the ID of the
> > execution,
> > >> which is expected to be used to merge the whole configuration)
> > >>
> > >> <build>
> > >> <plugins>
> > >> <plugin>
> > >> <artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId>
> > >> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> > >> <inherited>true</inherited>
> > >> <executions>
> > >> <execution>
> > >> <id>unpack-javascripts</id>
> > >> </execution>
> > >> </executions>
> > >> <configuration>
> > >> <artifactItems>
> > >> <artifactItem>
> > >>
> > >> <artifactId>sk-javascript-token</artifactId>
> > >>
> > >> <groupId>com.securekey.javascript</groupId>
> > >> <version>${project.version}</version>
> > >> <classifier>javascript</classifier>
> > >> <type>zip</type>
> > >> </artifactItem>
> > >> </artifactItems>
> > >> </configuration>
> > >> </plugin>
> > >> </plugins>
> > >> </build>
> > >>
> > >> So in general, the plugin configuration in the root POM will enforce
> > some
> > >> common things (destination folder, etc), and the usage will actually
> > allow
> > >> the developer to select what javascripts they need, without worrying
> > about
> > >> other configuration details.
> > >>
> > >> But the problem is when building, it's always the 2nd plugin
> > configuration
> > >> in the root POM that gets used, even though I specify the ID in the
> > leaf
> > >> POMs; so when I do an overall build, all the javascript files end up
> in
> > a
> > >> WSDL directory, even if I don't reference the WSDL execution at all.
> > >> I inverse the order, and the result is the opposite; the javascripts
> > end
> > >> up
> > >> in the right place, but all the WARs that have a WSDL dependency end
> up
> > >> with
> > >> a "scripts" directory full of WSDL files.
> > >>
> > >> I was under the impression that the ID is used to merge the
> > configurations
> > >> upon building the project, but I'm not seeing this. Is there a way to
> > >> specify exactly what configuration to bind to?
> > >> Specify two executions within the same<plugin> causes the same
> > behaviour,
> > >> except with both folders.
> > >>
> > >> To generalize, in a multi-module project, how can I use the same
> plugin
> > >> for
> > >> totally different uses/scenarios?
> > >>
> > >> thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Shan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ==============================================================================
> > This message contains privileged and confidential information intended
> for
> > the above addressees only. If you
> > receive this message in error please delete or destroy this message
> and/or
> > attachments.
> >
> > The sender of this message will fully cooperate in the civil and
> criminal
> > prosecution of any individual engaging
> > in the unauthorized use of this message.
> >
> >
>
> ==============================================================================
> >
>
>
>
>
> ==============================================================================
> This message contains privileged and confidential information intended for
> the above addressees only. If you
> receive this message in error please delete or destroy this message and/or
> attachments.
>
> The sender of this message will fully cooperate in the civil and criminal
> prosecution of any individual engaging
> in the unauthorized use of this message.
>
> ==============================================================================
>
