Wayne Fay wrote: >> 1) Yes, transitive dependencies of a war are ignored >> 2) Yes, this is on purpose >> 3) No, this isn't going to change >> 4) You can try fiddling with components.xml, but other stuff might break >> (see #2 above) > > This "final analysis" is why I originally suggested simply changing > the War packaging to Jar for purposes of a one-time dependency > analysis... but did not realize there were "a lot" of Wars that needed > to be analyzed. > > For relatively smaller projects involving fewer Wars, this can be a > reasonable solution, especially if this is not an analysis you will be > performing on a regular basis.
Actually we build all our wars with packaging type jar and use the war- plugin with an explicit execution step to produce the war as attached artifact. That way we can even in overlay scenarios inherit the original dependencies and simply exclude the jars form the overleyed wars. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
