Am Mittwoch, 7. Juli 2010 01:19:16 schrieb asookazian: [...] > This is one area where Ant is much more flexible than Maven (or at least > it's easier to customize invocations of targets in Ant than it is with > goals in Maven's lifecycle phases)...
Why don't you stick with Ant then? From your previous mails it seems to me like you are trying to use Maven like you did with Ant. Maven is not Ant! If you want to use Maven, use it the Maven way or you won't benefit from it at all. Start with reading a good Maven book like "Maven - The Definitve Guide" [0] from Sonatype (which seems is now split into two books). hth, - martin [0] http://www.sonatype.com/products/maven/documentation/book-defguide
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
