IANAL, The JRE is one thing...
Last time I checked, the JDK required that you display the EULA to the end user when installing the JDK... The net result was that we had to split up our one click installer into four: install the non-java stuff (Apache HTTPD), then the Sun JDK installer, then the open source java stuff (Apache Tomcat) and then finally our commercial code installer. But your legal heads can make their judgement calls as they see fit -Stephen On 4 August 2010 01:00, Jack Stanley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Legal reviewed the license agreement: > http://www.java.com/en/download/license.jsp . We already distribute the > JRE > as part of another product. We do not see any problems with distributing > the whole and complete JRE or the JDK. > > There is some wording under section B of the SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS > section. We are not entirely sure if we are "modifying" the software as > per > this section. We only want to repackage the JRE to include the JDK. We > are > not redistributing the software... it will be installed as a hosted > solution > in our own data centers. Based in this information, it is our opinion that > it is ok to distribute the JRE + jar utility. > -- > View this message in context: > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Adding-the-JRE-Jar-ulitily-to-the-build-tp2259801p2263529.html > Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
