On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Justin Edelson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/4/10 12:00 PM, Phillip Hellewell wrote: >> >> Consider this scenario. What if I had a "pom" artifact that didn't >> include a zip or jar or anything, but I need to depend on it because I >> need to get everything it depends on, and I want those dependencies to >> get unpacked? > > Then you can use the various exclude/include parameters to tune the > artifacts which will be unpacked.
Hmm, would a simple <excludeTypes>pom</excludeTypes> do the trick maybe? Phillip --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
