Thanks for the reply.

Had been trying to avoid that but seems I cannot.  Especially since
moving to the next SNAPSHOT version gets you to:

mvn <update-versioin-to-release-plugin> && mvn clean install && mvn
<update-version-to-next-snapshot-plugin>

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Justin Edelson
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, this is considered bad form. It might be possible to change some POJO
> properties, but that won't really do it, as you're finding. You can do
> something along these lines with multiple executions of Maven. I think there
> are some examples of this with the versions plugin. Something like:
>
> mvn versions:update-parent && mvn clean package
>
> Justin
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Mike Lenner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to write a plugin that allows me to change the version of the
>> current project during the build.  Is this considered bad form?  Is it
>> even possible?
>>
>> My use case is that I'd like to replicate what release:prepare is
>> doing but w/o tagging and w/o checking out new source and running the
>> build on that source.  I'd like to run mvn deploy -P release and in
>> doing so have my -SNAPSHOT version replaced with the release version
>> and then have my build progress as normal.
>>
>> I've tried using MavenProject.setVersion() but that seemed to have no
>> effect.  I next tried MavenProject.getArtifact().setVersion().  This
>> seemed to work better however the assembly plugin used later in my
>> build started to fail with a NPE.  Haven't tracked down exactly what
>> the connection is yet but thought I'd send an email out to see if
>> anyone else has done this and/or if this is a bad idea.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to