yea I got that from another question that i asked on this list that Benjamin Bentmann helped me solve. I must have read that "The combine.* attributes are however inherited along a hierarchy of POMs" wrong, or was hoping it meant that I could use it with other elements beyond configuration but it doesn't seem to work here. Benson, yea I know that I could overwrite executions (thought I mentioned that in my OP) but unfortunately some of these have quite a few (5 or more) executions and overwriting them at this time doesn't guarantee that they won't add more later.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've seen this. It was last discussed in terms of problems shifting > from <reporting> to the new maven3 stuff. > > http://www.sonatype.com/people/2011/01/maven-how-to-merging-plugin-configuration-in-complex-projects/ > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Wendy Smoak <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Tim <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I tried to use the combine.// syntax but that doesn't work: > >> > >> <plugin> > >> <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId> > >> <artifactId>sql-maven-plugin</artifactId> > >> <executions combine.self="override"/> // also tried with > >> combine.children > >> </plugin> > > > > Interesting. Where did you hear of that? I can't find anything on > > the Maven site: > > http://www.google.com/search?q=combine.self+site:maven.apache.org > > > > -- > > Wendy > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
