On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:42:01 +1000, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe what we need is to get a "stable" (even beta) release of Jelly > and Jexl to work off. I think my problems were conflicting versions of > Jelly and Jexl.
This will be difficult. The original authors of both Jelly and Jexl have deserted them with little community behind them. > Given the inactivity there, CVS HEAD is probably a decent starting point. :-) > If you are interested in having a look, you're welcome to flip Maven's > CVS HEAD to a newer Jelly build and see how it goes. It is current as > of RC4 (need to merge the core changes for 1.0 still). > > If you can get through all the touchstone tests and plugin tests, its > a fair bet its working. I'll give it a go at some point. -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
