On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:00:20 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did - that ran, but didn't produce the desired behaviour (and additionally > output the existing java.library.path value to stdout)
Hmmm...that's strange. > > Is the change I made to remove the scope attribute in the j:set call valid? Yes. it's quite valid, but less obvious. If it's working ok for you, just let me know. I'd also like to work up an FAQ entry on this with your help. Is that ok? -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
