I have settings.xml file under ./m2 directory as well as maven conf
directory (in case), but it doesn't work for me.  But I am glad I have found
a way and that is working for me. It looks like I have to use settingsFile
attributes and point it to a settings.xml file in the artifact:dependencies
element, see below

<artifact:dependencies filesetId="dependency.fileset" pomRefId="mypom"
settingsFile="./apache-maven-2.2.1/conf/settings.xml" />

Regards,
RJ.

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Stephen Connolly <
[email protected]> wrote:

> if ~/.ant/settings.xml exists it will read that
> otherwise if ~/.m2/settings.xml exists it will read that
> otherwise it assumes default settings.xml
>
> if your settings.xml has proxy details that is what it will use.
>
> I'd like to get the proxy settings more ant-like but too many things on my
> plate (plus it should use the settings.xml if that is present, only when in
> default mode should the ant proxy settings be used - that is if the proxy
> support was the way I think it should be)
>
> -Stephen
>
> On 16 May 2011 15:40, Rashid Jilani <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi: gurus I am trying to use the Maven ant task (
> > http://maven.apache.org/ant-tasks/index.html) behind the proxy but it is
> > not
> > working. First of all I am not sure how the maven ant task picks the
> > proxies
> > settings.
> >
> > 1. Does it go to local maven installation and pick the settings.xml ? or
> > maven-ant-tasks-2.1.3.jar contains the maven implementation itself. My
> > guess
> > is that maven-ant-tasks-2.1.3.jar is all you need to run Maven ant task?
> > can
> > some please confirms?
> >
> > 2. I already set both ant_opts as well as java_opts for the proxy setting
> > but no luck.
> >
> > 3. I can run the maven ant task from the same machine with out any issues
> > in
> > environment with out the proxies.
> >
> > 4. I can run default Maven and all other software behind proxy with out
> any
> > issue, so I am sure my proxy setting has no issue.
> >
> > Any help would be appreciated.
> >
> > Regards,
> > RJ.
> >
>

Reply via email to