I don't think that you're being quite fair here. When 3.0-beta-3 was released, the default assumption was that the next release would be beta-4. So any bugs fixed got marked 'fixed in beta 4'. Typically, a JIRA spends at least some weeks, if not months, marked 'fixed' in a release that isn't released yet, because it's waiting for its cohort of bugs to be fixed or for a volunteer to be available to run the release.
In this particular case, there is a level of additional confusion because of the policy decision that we don't need a beta-4. I'm not sure I'm entirely prepared to dispute your overall characterization of maven 3 -- depending on which features you care most about. On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Maven User <[email protected]> wrote: > Impressive. > > Maven 3 should still be labeled a beta release... > > Thanks Benson for the heads up, I appreciate it. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
