Brett Porter schrieb: > I noticed it had been left out of the new plugin, but didn't know if > it should be added back again. I think a few such tags were removed on > purpose. > > I assume it just gets left as is in the output, which might be a > problem in XHTML. > > I'll find out if the removal was intentional. > > - Brett
Hi Brett,
thank You for Your effort. I've feared, that this thread will get lost because of the much traffic here. I just want to ask You, if You've found out something about the removal?
Kind regards
Peter
> > On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 11:15:37 +0200, Peter Nabbefeld > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Hello, >> >>since 2004-01-06, the <glossary>-element has been silently removed. I'm >>currently doing some work to write a JavaHelp plugin, which should use >>xdocs (so one wouldn't need to duplicate documentation). I've got an old >>version of site.jsl (a customized version) containing the element and >>I've been happy to see, that it contains <glossary>-elements. Could You >>please tell me the reason for removing this element? And what would I >>get from the xdocs-plugin, if I use it now: the text contained in the >>element or simply nothing (whole element ignored)? The last (to get >>nothing) would be preferable, because it wouldn't have any impact on >>compatibility with files. >> >>Kind regards >> >>Peter Nabbefeld >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
