> I have testng, junit 3.81 and junit 4.8.1. TestNG is stable. junit 3.81 ran
I have to ask, is this something you have an honest need for in a business scenario or are you simply trying to climb Mt. Everest because it is there? I do not regularly see a need to support more than one unit test framework in a project, and you're asking to support 3 at the same time. > All my files run fine under the dos command line. To be honest I cannot > understand Enda's complicated solution. I don't see it as a complication solution. He is simply making multiple invocations of Surefire and telling one to process the JUnit files while the other gets to process the TestNG files. > Does this warrant being reported as > a bug? If you think it is a bug, then feel free to post a JIRA. Just realize that not all bugs will get the same level of attention by the dev team. I see this as more of a feature request myself. > Would anybody be willing to look at the code if i place it somewhere? > In its present state, it is pretty trivial and easy to reproduce. Recognize that you are dealing with open source projects (Maven, JUnit, TestNG and Surefire) and that people around here scratch their own itch. If this issue is a big problem for you, you will probably need to hack the code yourself to support this use case and then donate the code changes back for possible inclusion in a future release. Wayne --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
