> WIthout thinking about it, I've always assumed that, if I tell shade to > replace the final artifact with the shaded output, that somehow the d-r-pom > would become 'the pom' for the benefit of consumers. And it does end up in > the rep. But the pom in the jar's META-INF seems to be the original.
Sounds like a bug to me too! I'd expect to see the d-r-pom in the artifact as well as the repo. Wayne --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
