On Sat, January 5, 2013 2:43 pm, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: > Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:38:38 -0800, /Manfred Moser/: > >> If the dependencies are not applicable for this artifact (e.g. the pom >> is >> not valid for it because it is generated against Maven convention) then >> it >> should not be an artifact in the same coordinates but rather be a >> different module with different GAV coordinates > > All right. That's pretty much what I've thought, but then revisit > the EJB plugin case I've given: > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-ejb-plugin/examples/ejb-client-dependency.html > > Seems like not the best practice - why it has been introduced, then?
A mistake? I don't know. But nothing stops you from having two modules with different coordinates for the ejb and the ejb client from what I understand.. but I have not used ejb for ages so I might be completely off. manfred --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
