I made that page a long, long time ago based on a complaint (on this
list) that such a page did not exist. I had nothing specific to post
there myself at the time and expected that other Maven users (or even
myself) might, at some point, replace the "lorem ipsum" text with
something more substantial.

Obviously that has not yet occurred.

Wayne

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Stadelmann Josef
<josef.stadelm...@axa-winterthur.ch> wrote:
> Unfortunately the link below does not show anything to read in English ...
> Josef
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2013 15:54
> An: Maven Users List
> Betreff: Re: Git Repositories
>
> You would imaging somewhere like:
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Maven+Best+Practice+Guide
>
> But documentation of best practices is something we are weak on...
>
> We are great at telling people what isn't best practice... not so great at 
> documenting that stuff ;-)
>
> A wise user would add a child page to that wiki page, and perhaps remove the 
> placeholder text! (Given that the linked page is the *user* contributed
> wiki)
>
>
> On 21 February 2013 14:47, Eric Kolotyluk <eric.koloty...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, I think I've got it.
>>
>> The answer depends more on what artifacts will always have the same
>> version number, than how many artifacts there are.
>>
>> In a nutshell, one repository for the entire multi-module project is
>> best, where all the artifacts keep their versions in sync with the parent 
>> pom.
>>
>> But, if you have to support artifacts with versions out of sync, then
>> the out of sync versions need their own repositories. More work to
>> manage, but sometimes necessary.
>>
>> Thanks for the clarification. Where would I find these kinds of best
>> practices written down?
>>
>> Cheers, Eric
>>
>>
>> On 2013-02-21 1:25 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>>
>>> One git repository for everything that is always released together
>>> and has the same version number.
>>>
>>> If there are some sub-modules that have a different lifecycle, they
>>> should be in a separate git repository. That may force you to split
>>> the other modules you thought were always released as one into two
>>> other git repositories. Lather, rince, repeat
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21 February 2013 07:16, Eric Kolotyluk <eric.koloty...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  I'm a git newbie and I was wondering if there are any best practices
>>>> around using maven with git people could point me to?
>>>>
>>>> For example, if I have a project with several artifacts/modules
>>>>
>>>> net.kolotyluk.coolapp
>>>> - client.jar
>>>> - common.jar
>>>> - service.jar
>>>>
>>>> is it better to create a single repository "net.kolotyluk.coolapp"
>>>> for the project, or several repositories such as
>>>> "net.kolotyluk.coolapp.client"
>>>> "net.kolotyluk.coolapp.common" and "net.kolotyluk.coolapp.****service"
>>>> for
>>>> each artifact?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Eric
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------**
>>>> --**---------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>> users-unsubscribe@maven.**apac**he.org<http://apache.org>
>>>> <users-unsubscribe@**maven.apache.org<users-unsubscribe@maven.apache
>>>> .org>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**------
>> --- To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> users-unsubscribe@maven.**apache.org<users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.or
>> g> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to