For now, I have solved our problem of duplicate phase execution by
commenting-out the reporting
stanza's of our pom file.

Everything we need is produced by goals other than 'site' - except
findbugs. For that, we are now
making an explicit call to 'findbugs:check' (bound to 'verify') which
doesn't seem to have
the 'forked-duplication' problem.

All of our reports are being generated post-build by Jenkins, so everything
is working.

Thanks,

Mike



On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]>
wrote:

> - use Maven 3.2.2 at least: MNG-5630 will really help you understand
> - if not possible, use m-site-p 3.4: MSHARED-333 does something quite
> equivalent and doesn't require a specific Maven version
>
> and you can read MJAVADOC-171, where I managed to analyze the problem
> (quite
> recently...) and explained it as much as possible
>
>
> in summary, there is a problem with forked lifecycles launched by plugins
> executed from m-site-p (which gets even bigger when run in aggregated
> mode): I
> now understand the problem, given previous analysis (which took me a few
> years
> of thinking/trying/...), but I still didn't have time to work on a fix
>
> If you're interested on working with me on this, I'll be happy to have
> someone
> with me
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le jeudi 21 août 2014 22:53:03 Michael Norman a écrit :
> > I have a simple Maven project (a web-app) that uses the '
> > frontend-maven-plugin'
> > to handle various Javascript-related chores (installing node, running
> > Grunt, Karma etc.)
> >
> > Unfortunately, the frontend stuff runs twice on a 'mvn clean site'
> command
> > - when
> > I turned on debug-output (in Eclipse) I can "see" the reactor list 2
> calls
> > to the frontend plugin.
> >
> > Is there any techniques or help anyone can suggest to try to figure out
> > what is causing
> > the extra execution?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > ---
> > Mike Norman
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to