What about using https .. does that compare in speed or is it faster? If faster.. why not use it?
manfred Curtis Rueden wrote on 12.09.2014 11:31: > Hi Kevin, > >> I think the issue is that I”m using scpexe for my >> distributionManagement repository. > > Is there some reason you can't just use wagon-ssh? > > http://stackoverflow.com/a/14404990 > > Regards, > Curtis > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Kevin Burton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> "mvn package” on my code , without tests, is actually pretty fast. Takes >> about one minute. (I don’t need the tests btw as I’m using continuous >> integration and the code is already tested). >> >> One minute is pretty darn good… >> >> The problem is that ‘deploy’ takes about 7 minutes. >> >> That’s kind of not fun. >> >> I think the issue is that I”m using scpexe for my distributionManagement >> repository. >> >> Any options for improving the performance here? >> >> I think the issue is creating new SSH connections each time. I could use >> ControlPersist I think… which is an SSH feature to keep the SSH connection >> in the background and re-use it. >> >> Downside: This will require me to use a custom SSH config everywhere. >> >> Another option is to use a file:// repository which is local and then rsync >> the binaries over in one pass. >> >> Downside: kind of jacky and requires an additional step. >> >> Any other options ? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com >> Location: *San Francisco, CA* >> blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com >> … or check out my Google+ profile >> <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> >> <http://spinn3r.com> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
