The Maven style build will also lock you in to a small subset of Jenkins's usual features. And when you eventually need a feature not available with a Maven-style build, there is no conversion path from Maven-style to Freestyle -- you have to recreate the job (losing the build history etc.).
-Curtis On Sep 23, 2014 7:33 AM, "Stephen Connolly" <[email protected]> wrote: > Freestyle does not mess with your build and change it from building the way > maven intends. Google "stephen's java adventures Jenkins maven considered > evil" for a more detailed discussion > > On Tuesday, 23 September 2014, James Green <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On 23 September 2014 02:23, Curtis Rueden <[email protected] > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Also, stay away from the Jenkins "Maven" style job. Freestyle is more > > > flexible and less buggy. > > > > > > > Based on ..? > > > > > -- > Sent from my phone >
