Hi Karl Heinz!

On 26 Nov 2014, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:

> Hi Martin,
> 
> first can you create a project which reproduces the problem...otherwise 
> it's really hard to drill down the issue...

I don't know if I can create such a project. I'll try and start with a
simple project as described in my original post. We'll see if this
suffices...

> Furthermore have you defined the dependencies in your ear module which 
> should be skinnyfied...

I just checked and I do have most of the dependencies listed in the EAR
but some are missing. I'll fix this and see if this changes anything.

> Does you ear module contain other dependencies which could have the jars 
> you don't like to have in your ear as a transitive dependency?

Sorry, I don't get you. I want JARs *to be* in the EAR and no to "not be
in the EAR".

> Can you post your pom file ?

Well, the actual project has more than 150 modules without the
dependencies. I don't think posting the whole pom makes sense. I'll try
to create a sample project instead (could take me some time). If you just
want some m-ear-p configuration or the like, just let me know. I could of
course post this.

[...]
> > I'd be happy to provide a sample project but I'm not sure how to
> > provide this as it also seems to depend on the infrastructure.
> 
> Hm...you say on one side it's a bug of maven-ear-plugin but here you say 
> different... ?...

As changing the version of the m-ear-p is enough to fix the problem I
really do think it's a bug in the ear plugin.

But the bug only triggers in situations that depend on the infrastructure.

Does this make more sens to you?

- martin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to