I guess another thought is that the remote repository could use apache
mod_rewrite to take maven layout requests and serve them from an
existing layout if you didn't need the upstream handling maven-proxy
provides.

Cheers,
Brett


On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:13:35 +1000, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep.
> 
> It's worth keeping in mind that the local repository is really just a
> cache. If you are all sharing a directory of JARs somewhere that
> should be a "remote" repository (these can be http, file or ftp
> based).
> 
> Layout of the remote repository different to Maven would require what
> Carlos brought up.
> 
> Cheers,
> Brett
> 
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:41:38 +0200, Carlos Sanchez
> 
> 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I suggest you to take a look to maven-proxy http://maven-proxy.codehaus.org
> > or repoweb http://repoweb.sourceforge.net/ to write a layer between maven
> > and your propietary repo,
> > Intercepting maven requests and translating them to your layout.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Carlos Sanchez
> > A Coru�a, Spain
> > http://www.jroller.com/page/carlossg/Weblog
> >
> > Oness Project
> > http://oness.sourceforge.net
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Didier Dubois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 11:26 PM
> > > To: Maven Users List
> > > Subject: Re: Local Repository layout?
> > >
> > > Hi Jason,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your quick answer.
> > > I understand your point of view, and fully agree with.
> > >
> > > However I live in situation where I cannot change anything in
> > > the current layout (which is great however, here, to have
> > > something that actually exists!) [You know,... the legacy
> > > stuffs, that where there even before Java was born :-)]
> > >
> > > Furthermore, the existing layout is not bad at all, so I have
> > > no agrument to bring thousands of developpers to follow the
> > > Maven directives.
> > >
> > > On the other side I would like to use Maven as I used it in
> > > former project (when I was able to decide the project layout
> > > and structure). I am missing all those Maven reports,
> > > dependency consistency,... and more,....
> > > I know I can override some properties on the
> > > project.properties file, but it seems to me a little bit
> > > tedious, and certainly not the "correct way" to use Maven.
> > > (Am I wrong?)
> > >
> > > And I am pretty sure I am not the only one here that cannot
> > > use Maven, just because something alredy exists in their
> > > context. (votes...?)
> > >
> > > So may be can I develop a plugin or something to do the
> > > sutff? Any idea?
> > > direction to see (I've never created any Maven plugin),.....
> > > Other suggestion?
> > > Again, I would'nt like to modify the Maven code, even if I
> > > have a precise idea of what to do.
> > >
> > > Every remarks would be welcome!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Didier
> > >
> > >
> > > Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > >
> > > >On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 14:22, Didier Dubois wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>Dear All,
> > > >>
> > > >>I would like to use Maven in our current context.
> > > >>We already have a local repository with a consistent layout.
> > > >>
> > > >>Is there a way to override the local repository layout
> > > instead of having:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >Currently in the maven 1.x codebase no, there isn't. When
> > > more of the
> > > >2.x code is integrated into the 1.x codebase this will
> > > technically be
> > > >possible but it is really a matter of policy. I don't think it is
> > > >something that would really be encouraged. That said it won't be
> > > >anytime soon that those portions of 2.x will be backported to 1.x so
> > > >you're on your own.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>$repository_root/<packageId>/jars/<packageId>-<version>.<art
> > > ifact_type> ?
> > > >>
> > > >>Any idea (except modifying some Maven classes and use a
> > > "home brewed"
> > > >>maven version....)
> > > >>
> > > >>Thanks in advance!
> > > >>
> > > >>Regards
> > > >>Didier
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---------
> > > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to