First, the link you gave redirects to a page saying CVS repositories have been migrated and it doesn't point forward
Second, the "proc" flag of the aspectj-maven-plugin is described also on the plugin's website http://www.mojohaus.org/aspectj-maven-plugin/compile-mojo.html#proc Third, I don't see how this answers my questions? And which workaround does this apply to? On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Martin Gainty <[email protected]> wrote: > take a look athttp:// > dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.aspectj/?root=Tools_Project > find your way to this artifact:<groupId>org.aspectj</groupId> > <artifactId>aspectjtools</artifactId> <packaging>jar</packaging> > <version>1.8.5</version> <name>AspectJ tools</name> <description>Tools > from the AspectJ project</description> <url>http://www.aspectj.org</url> > take a gander at AjcTask.java and notice the setting of javac arg called > 'proc' > /** * Controls whether annotation processing and/or compilation is > done. * -proc:none means that compilation takes place without annotation > processing. * -proc:only means that only annotation processing is done, > without any subsequent compilation. */ public void setProc(String proc) > { if (proc.equals("none")) { cmd.addFlag("-proc:none", true); } > else if (proc.equals("only")) { cmd.addFlag("-proc:only", true); } > } > -proc: {none,only}Controls whether annotation processing and/or > compilation is done. -proc:none means that compilation takes place without > annotation processing. -proc:only means that only annotation processing is > done, without any subsequent compilation. > javac -proc:only (needs to be set on any phase before compile such as > generate-sources) within aspectj environment this is enabled by argument > -Dorg.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.generateClassFiles on command line > > javac -proc:none(needs to be set only on compile phase) > -Dorg.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler.generateClassFiles absent on command line > > HTH > Martin > > > > Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 13:42:53 +0200 > > Subject: Re: Should I disable maven-compiler-plugin when using > aspectj-maven-compiler? > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > > > Both, actually. > > In any case, using aspectj compiler through the maven-compiler-plugin > seems > > to be causing more issues (it depends on an older version of aspectj > tools, > > and raising it causes API errors) so it's definitely not the way for me. > > > > I'm guessing my issue comes mainly from the fact that > maven-compiler-plugin > > 3.1+ has an issue with incremental compilation, so a workaround is > > mandatory in the current situation... > > It is indeed peculiar that there isn't more info on that matter but then > > again I'm not sure how many people use aspectj and maven together > > > > Doing some more google work brought me to these: > > - > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14614446/how-do-i-disable-the-maven-compiler-plugin > > - > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24211943/aspectj-maven-plugin-declare-soft-how-to-compile > > - https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/aspectj-users/msg14431.html > > > > The last one is actually a post from the aspectj-users mailing list from > > about 2 years ago, asking about the same issue, although the person > didn't > > seem to get a response. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Does this act differently though than the aspectj-maven-plugin? Does > it > > > > play well with AJDT and eclipse? > > > > > > > > > > I don't know; I don't use aspectj. Couldn't find any pointers on this > in > > > the aspact-maven-plugin docs so it might be the wrong path. However, > > > couldn't find any instructions on using your workaround either...:-) > > > As you stated "aspectj-compiler-plugin" in the subject, I thought that > you > > > wanted to use the aspectj compiler. But maybe I misunderstood and you > just > > > want to weave with aspectj? > > > > > > /Anders > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Can't you just tell maven-compiler-plugin to use the aspectj > compiler? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-compiler-plugin/non-javac-compilers.html > > > > > > > > > > /Anders > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Dagan Sandler < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am in the process of updating my plugin definitions in all of > the > > > > > > projects I manage. > > > > > > Notably, I tried updating maven-compiler-plugin from 2.5.1 to > 3.3 but > > > > > > encountered an issue in a project that uses aspectj-maven-plugin. > > > > > > > > > > > > The issue is, it seems, that the maven-compiler-plugin is invoked > > > > before > > > > > > the aspectj-maven-plugin, and causes the build to fail. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have previously used a workaround for this issue by setting the > > > > > > aspectj-maven-plugin to execute in phase process-sources, so it's > > > > invoked > > > > > > before the maven plugin > > > > > > However, in maven-compiler-plugin 3.1+ there's this bug > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCOMPILER-209> which > causes > > > the > > > > > > maven-compiler-plugin to recompile all sources and to fail the > build, > > > > so > > > > > > you must set useIncrementalCompilation to *false* > > > > > > > > > > > > Another workaround I found before finding out about the > incremental > > > > build > > > > > > bug, is to disable the maven-compiler-plugin altogether in that > > > project > > > > > and > > > > > > let aspectj-maven-plugin do all the compilation by adding > > > > > > <execution> > > > > > > <id>default-compile</id> > > > > > > <phase>none</phase> > > > > > > </execution> > > > > > > to the maven-compiler-plugin definition > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone knows the downsides of any of these workarounds? Is there > > > > another > > > > > > configuration that I should be using instead of these options? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
