On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 9 March 2016, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > I assume it should be this (instead of spy): >> > http://maven.apache.org/examples/maven-3-lifecycle-extensions.html >> > >> > And instead of starting beer machine, it can inject the value into the >> > session that you got from whenever... >> >> I don't think this can work as a thing configured in the POM. Unless >> these items can be dropped into the ext directory instead of >> configured in the the pom as an extension. Is that the case in general >> that the ext dir is the same thing as declaring in the POM as an >> extension? > > > That's where the .mvn folder as an extension loading mechanism kicks in
What version did that show up in? Prior, it has to be in a dir in the maven home, right? > > >> >> >> > >> > maven related changes merely laxed the validation to allow those three >> > expressions in version, but does not provide anything as "source" for >> those. >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 2:44 PM Stephen Connolly < >> > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > >> >> I have no clue... that is a different question we should ask of the >> person >> >> who implemented this functionality >> >> >> >> On 9 March 2016 at 13:40, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Stephen Connolly >> >> > <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> > > In the .mvn folder put an extension that contributes the ${rev} >> >> property >> >> > > based on whatever you seem safe >> >> > >> >> > Stephen, can you please offer some details? Just what sort of >> >> > extension? An event spy that sees session start? Something else? Does >> >> > this require 3.3.x or does it work with 3.2.5? >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > Then just have the project version include the ${rev} at the >> >> appropriate >> >> > > place >> >> > > >> >> > > On Tuesday 8 March 2016, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Eric B <ebenza...@gmail.com >> <javascript:;> >> >> > <javascript:;>> >> >> > >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > The first question I have to ask is what you are trying to >> >> accomplish >> >> > >> with >> >> > >> > your continuous-delivery? >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> We have a Maven multi-module build which has thousands of unit >> tests. >> >> We >> >> > >> use Bamboo for CI and if we get a green build that means that all >> the >> >> > tests >> >> > >> pass of course and that we successfully deployed the build to our >> repo >> >> > (we >> >> > >> use Artifactory). We use the Maven's deploy to deploy, not the >> release >> >> > >> plugin. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> At this point anyone can use the built product out of Bamboo's >> saved >> >> > >> artifacts or Artifactory: our internal/external consultants, sales >> >> > >> engineers, formal QA, other downstream, products, and so on. It's >> up >> >> to >> >> > the >> >> > >> PO to decide when to slap a new major or minor version label and >> >> he/she >> >> > can >> >> > >> do at anytime. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> From development's POV, a green build is a released product, with a >> >> > version >> >> > >> for example 3.1.201601070101 (3.1.YYYYMMDDHHMM). We used to have >> the >> >> SVN >> >> > >> version number as the maintenance version part but we are >> switching to >> >> > Git >> >> > >> soon, hence the move to timestamps. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Our parent POM contains what is considered a Maven "hack": >> >> > >> >> >> > >> <properties> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> <maven.build.timestamp.format>yyyyMMddHHmm</maven.build.timestamp.format> >> >> > >> <version.major>3</version.major> >> >> > >> <version.minor>1</version.minor> >> >> > >> <version.main>${version.major}.${version.minor}</version.main> >> >> > >> <revision>${maven.build.timestamp}</revision> >> >> > >> <dv.version>${version.main}.${revision}</dv.version> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Each module then has: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> <version>${dv.version}</version> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> What is the Maven way to achieve this goal? >> >> > >> >> >> > >> Gary >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > Are you trying to put snapshot versions into a >> >> > >> > production/release state? >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > The biggest issue I have noticed with teams is the >> misunderstanding >> >> of >> >> > >> how >> >> > >> > SNAPSHOTs work, or their purpose in the development process. >> Either >> >> > >> teams >> >> > >> > want to release applications in SNAPSHOT mode, or release code >> that >> >> is >> >> > >> > essentially in SNAPSHOT (ie: development) mode, but with fixed >> >> version >> >> > >> > numbers. But instead of changing version numbers, they use >> >> something >> >> > >> like >> >> > >> > a timestamp to increment version numbers automatically. But at >> the >> >> > end >> >> > >> of >> >> > >> > it all, it kind of contravenes maven's versioning concept. >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > Normally, if your artifact is a work in progress, you should >> just be >> >> > >> using >> >> > >> > a SNAPSHOT. If you are looking to make a real release, then you >> >> > should >> >> > >> be >> >> > >> > promoting your code from a SNAPSHOT to a fixed version. >> Generally, >> >> > the >> >> > >> > concept of continuous-delivery should only apply when in a >> SNAPSHOT >> >> > mode, >> >> > >> > since anything else isn't changing (ie: a fixed release doesn't >> need >> >> > to >> >> > >> be >> >> > >> > re-delivered). >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > So then that begs the question why you need to constantly change >> >> your >> >> > >> > version numbers during your development phase? >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > And if the goal is truly to have fixed versions for some other >> team >> >> to >> >> > >> have >> >> > >> > access to a "stable" version of your artifact (ie: they can be >> >> > guaranteed >> >> > >> > that it isn't going to change as you continue to develop), you >> could >> >> > >> always >> >> > >> > use something like the maven-release-plugin to promote from >> SNAPSHOT >> >> > to a >> >> > >> > fixed version, and then re-open the next version as a SNAPSHOT. >> >> > >> (Although >> >> > >> > I know there are many dissenters against the release-plugin). >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > Thanks, >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > Eric >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Gary Gregory < >> >> garydgreg...@gmail.com <javascript:;> >> >> > >> <javascript:;>> >> >> > >> > wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > > Is there a Maven-way to do continuous delivery then? As opposed >> >> > >> > > to continuous integration. >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > Our current hack is to use the date as the maintenance version >> as >> >> a >> >> > >> > > variable for example 3.1.20160102 >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > G >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Eric B <ebenza...@gmail.com >> <javascript:;> >> >> > >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > > I personally have a pet-peeve of using system variables to >> >> define >> >> > >> > version >> >> > >> > > > numbers; I find it is counter productive to the building of >> >> maven >> >> > >> > > > artifacts. There is no traceability to determine the actual >> >> > version >> >> > >> > of >> >> > >> > > an >> >> > >> > > > artifact once it has been built. At least having a fixed >> >> version >> >> > >> > number >> >> > >> > > in >> >> > >> > > > the <version> element shows up in the META-INF/maven/../pom.* >> >> > files. >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > Is using a variable for the version even a good idea? >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > Thanks, >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > Eric >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Stephen Connolly < >> >> > >> > > > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com <javascript:;> >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > > only specific properties are permitted for expansion in >> XPath >> >> > paths >> >> > >> > > that >> >> > >> > > > > match the following regex >> >> > >> > > /project/(parent/)?(groupId|artifactId|version) >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > On 2 March 2016 at 05:39, Raghu <raghunath...@yahoo.com >> <javascript:;> >> >> .invalid >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > wrote: >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > I have a POM with parent node as below: <parent> >> >> > >> > > > > > <groupId>com.test</groupId> >> >> > <artifactId>pom.parent</artifactId> >> >> > >> > > > > > <version>${test.version}</version> >> >> > >> > > > > > <relativePath>../scripts/pom.xml</relativePath> </parent> >> >> > >> > > > > > This used to work till maven 3.3.3 version - mvn clean >> >> > install. >> >> > >> > > > However, >> >> > >> > > > > > the version 3.3.9 throws error though. When I change the >> >> > version >> >> > >> > to a >> >> > >> > > > > value >> >> > >> > > > > > instead of the variable, it works fine. >> >> > >> > > > > > Won't maven support variable for version? Or is it a bug >> >> with >> >> > >> > 3.3.9? >> >> > >> > > > > > Appreciate your response... >> >> > >> > > > > > - regards,raghu >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > -- >> >> > >> > > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> | >> >> ggreg...@apache.org <javascript:;> >> >> > >> <javascript:;> >> >> > >> > > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> >> > >> > > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> >> > >> > > JUnit in Action, Second Edition < >> http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/ >> >> > >> >> > >> > > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> >> > >> > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> >> > >> > > Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> >> > >> > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> -- >> >> > >> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;> | >> ggreg...@apache.org <javascript:;> >> >> > >> <javascript:;> >> >> > >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> >> > >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> >> > >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> >> > >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> >> > >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> >> > >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> >> > >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > -- >> >> > > Sent from my phone >> >> > >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> <javascript:;> >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org >> <javascript:;> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org <javascript:;> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org >> <javascript:;> >> >> > > -- > Sent from my phone --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org