AFAIK: jetty plugin is implemented only for the war deployment in-container
integration tests that jeff mentioned
There are maven-failsafe-plugin integration-test(s) such as multiple-summaries
which do not use jetty e.g.
/failsafe-plugin/src/it/multiple-summaries/target/failsafe-reports/failsafe-summary-1.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><failsafe-summary timeout="false">
<completed>1</completed> <errors>0</errors> <failures>0</failures>
<skipped>0</skipped> <failureMessage/></failsafe-summary>
does this conform to your understanding?
Martin ______________________________________________
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Does Failsafe Require Jetty?
> From: [email protected]
> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:35:41 -0500
>
> I've been taking a first look at documentation for the Failsafe plugin. It
> looked straightforward until I got to the part that discussed Jetty. I
> found the Jetty section confusing, as it seems to imply that Jetty is
> required to Failsafe. I hope I'm misunderstanding it, and that Failsafe
> can be run *without* Jetty.
>
> Another point where I found the documentation somewhat lacking: Under
> what scenarios would I WANT to run Jetty & Failsafe together? Is this only
> for server applications, or is there some other use case I'm overlooking?
>
>
> **
>
> This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential
> and/or privileged for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any use,
> review, disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance by others, and any
> forwarding of this email or its contents, without the express permission of
> the sender is strictly prohibited by law. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender immediately, delete the e-mail and
> destroy all copies.
> **
