On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Florian Schätz <fscha...@assona.net> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2017, 14:22 -0800 schrieb Benson Margulies:
>> I agree with them that this is counter-intuitive. The whole point of
>> -beta-1 is to introduce new, incompatible, stuff. The whole point of
>> that range is to exclude it.
> Doesn't 2.0.0-beta1 imply that it's a beta for the 2.0.0 release, so
> that the final 2.0.0 release will include everything that's in this
> beta, thus the range quite correctly contains it...?

The range [1,2) excludes 2.0.0. So, by your logic, which is my logic,
it should also exclude the beta.
> If the stuff from the 2.0.0-beta1 will not be part of the final 2.0.0
> release, wouldn't it be better called 2.0.1-beta1?
> Just curious because we had some discussions about versioning strategies
> here, too, a while ago.
> Regards,
> Flo

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to