Hi Xander,

Sorry, I lost track, having a look now.

When I see that you are implementing Mojo's "execute()" [1] while using 
maven-reporting-impl, you are in fact defeating the objective of 
maven-reporting-impl: do that for you.

maven-reporting-impl would probably need better documentation, I need help, but 
the IT [2] tries to show how to write such reporting code that can be run both 
as goal and a maven-site's report

And if you want to see how it does the job, you can look at 
maven-reporting-impl AbstractMavenReport implementation of execute() [3]: yes, 
that implementation changed, and now I remember I had to update it because of 
the NPE that it could cause. You must not rewrite this code.

HTH

Hervé


[1] 
https://github.com/dev-aspectj/aspectj-maven-plugin/blob/main/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/aspectj/AjcReportMojo.java#L210

[2] 
https://github.com/apache/maven-reporting-impl/tree/master/src/it/setup-reporting-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/reporting/its/custom

[3] 
https://github.com/apache/maven-reporting-impl/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/reporting/AbstractMavenReport.java#L187

Le mercredi 4 octobre 2023, 04:05:58 CEST Alexander Kriegisch a écrit :
> Hello Hervé.
> 
> Did the reproducer help you in any way?
> 
> Regards
> 
> > Hello Hervé.
> > 
> >>> I tried to upgrade those
> >>> dependencies to the most recent Doxia and Sitetools versions.
> >> 
> >> by "most recent", do you mean most recent from 1.x or 2.0.0-M*?
> > 
> > I mean 2.0.0-M*. Actually, the project works nicely and I would have
> > ignored the Dependabot suggestions, but all those Maven warnings about
> > outdated or EOL components made me start upgrading them. I was under the
> > impression that Doxia milestones are just as stable and production-ready
> > as Surefire ones, so I did not think much and gaven them a go.
> > 
> >> 1.x should not cause issues
> >> 
> >> 2.0.0-M*, as expected from the version number, is more risky and not yet
> >> fully
> >> 
> >> stable
> > 
> > Then maybe it is better to revert to 1.x and let users live live with the
> > Plexus warnings for a little longer.
> > 
> >> Such reporting plugin coding has so many ways to be done that sharing a
> >> reproducer is the easiest way to have concrete view on what is happening,
> >> particularly if you're going to 2.0.0-M*
> > 
> > Sure, it is about https://github.com/dev-aspectj/aspectj-maven-plugin.
> > 
> > On the main branch,
> > 
> >   -- an older commit like 93110452 shows the (stable) situation before I
> >   
> >      started various and sundry plugins and dependencies,
> >   
> >   -- second-latest commit 7b8706a7 - see also build
> >   
> >      https://github.com/dev-aspectj/aspectj-maven-plugin/actions/runs/6230
> >      950536
> >      - shows an intermediate step in which the plugin's reporting
> >      goalfails in integration tests,
> >   
> >   -- latest commit 1a819a4e stabilises the integration tests, but is a
> >   
> >      hacky work-in-progress commit that needs to be cleaned up. You
> >      asked for a reproducer, so I pushed the commit.
> > 
> > You can build the plugin quickly, if you deactivate the
> > 'integration-test' profile. In order to reproduce the problem, run
> > something like
> > 
> > mvn -Dinvoker.test=CreateReport verify -P integration-test
> > 
> > on the lat6est commit, but locally revert this change in
> > AjcReportMojo.java:
> > https://github.com/dev-aspectj/aspectj-maven-plugin/commit/1a819a4e0b2c3c
> > d34797c3122488ea5833cf9fd5#diff-64f2431d9507f2996b65ccf8f9a4e202923d456e31
> > 579f3809ef4d648509b62e
> > 
> > Regards
> > --
> > Xander
> > https://scrum-master.de
> > 
> >> Le jeudi 7 septembre 2023, 04:35:29 CEST Alexander Kriegisch a écrit :
> >>> Hello Maven community.
> >>> 
> >>> In a Maven plugin using old 1.x Doxia and Sitetool versions, I am
> >>> getting
> >>> warnings because those again use an EOL Plexus component. The details
> >>> are
> >>> not so important, the important part is that I tried to upgrade those
> >>> dependencies to the most recent Doxia and Sitetools versions.
> >>> 
> >>> One class in the plugin extends
> >>> org.apache.maven.reporting.AbstractMavenReport. It implements an
> >>> executeReport(Locale) method, which so far was fine. But now, it also
> >>> inherits execute() from the abstract parent class. The latter method is
> >>> always called when using the reporting goal for my plugin. The result is
> >>> an
> >>> 
> >>> error like this:
> >>>   Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke
> >>> 
> >>> "org.apache.maven.doxia.tools.SiteTool.getSiteLocales(String)" because
> >>> "this.siteTool" is null at
> >>> org.apache.maven.reporting.AbstractMavenReport.getLocale
> >>> (AbstractMavenReport.java:400) at
> >>> org.apache.maven.reporting.AbstractMavenReport.reportToMarkup
> >>> (AbstractMavenReport.java:212) at
> >>> org.apache.maven.reporting.AbstractMavenReport.execute
> >>> (AbstractMavenReport.java:189)
> >>> 
> >>> I see that AbstractMavenReport defines the 'siteTool' field as follows:
> >>>   @Component
> >>>   protected SiteTool siteTool;
> >>> 
> >>> I am wondering why that field is null. Should it not be populated
> >>> automatically by dependency injection? I have a dirty workaround for
> >>> this
> >>> 
> >>> problem:
> >>>   @Override
> >>>   public void execute() throws MojoExecutionException {
> >>>   
> >>>       //super.execute();
> >>>       try {
> >>>       
> >>>           executeReport(Locale.getDefault());
> >>>       
> >>>       }
> >>>       catch (MavenReportException e) {
> >>>       
> >>>           throw new MojoExecutionException(e);
> >>>       
> >>>       }
> >>>   
> >>>   }
> >>> 
> >>> This way, 'siteTool' is not used and method
> >>> SiteTool.getSiteLocales(String)
> >>> never called. But I guess, that is not a good solution to the problem.
> >>> How
> >>> are plugin implementors meant to deal with this situation? Or is this
> >>> some
> >>> kind of bug? I am unsure how to proceed. I am by no means a Maven plugin
> >>> buff and merely helping to keep an existing plugin alive. I would be
> >>> grateful for hints.
> >>> 
> >>> Regards
> >> 
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to