correct, in order to get test:single to work with integration as the
main artifact
one needs to fool test:single that it has test to run (that is why I say
prepare to dig into test:single source to understand its requirements )

perhaps you can submit your plugin into plugin's sandbox so we 
can use it?

-D

On 6/17/05, David Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I actually did create such a plugin because I wanted my integration tests as 
> part of the same project as the code it was testing.  I also didn't want my 
> "integration test" project to be included by the multiproject (and didn't 
> want to hard-code an exclude for it, either).  This sort of thing comes up a 
> lot, and I think it's a vaild scenario.
> 
> I didn't want to have to create a whole new plugin to run the other set of 
> tests, but was forced to because the test plugin doesn't allow for overriding 
> the test source directory--it pulls it directly from the pom, no questions 
> asked.  It would be better if the test plugin used a property for the test 
> source dir, which defaulted to the directory mentioned in the pom; then a 
> goal could override it.
> 
> ..David..
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dan tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Fri 6/17/2005 9:06 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: How to split unit and acceptance tests apart (both use Junit 
> framework)
> 
> src/main/java is the maven recommend directory structure.  This way I can
> so have src/main/resources, both indicating they are belonging to the main
> artifact.  It is more organized that way
> 
> <unitTestSourceDirectory> can only understand by maven-test-plugin
> the real unit test. So if you point it to your main src, your tests will be
> automatically invoked after compilation.  and you dont want that.
> 
> Last, if you put your integration test cases as the main artifact, then you 
> can
> use test:single in maven-test-plugin to invoke your integration.  Be prepare
> to dig into maven-test-plugin to understand test:single requirement.
> (hmm, perhaps we should start thinking about maven-integration-junit-plugin 
> ;-)
> 
> -Dan
> 
> 
> On 6/17/05, Craig McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is the reasoning for the extra "main" level? Why not src/java.
> >
> > Also, couldn't you just set the <unitTestSourceDirectory> to
> > src/main/java and point <sourceDirectory> someplace empty? I am going
> > to be going through this same process soon. Please share what you
> > consider to be the best practice here (and why - it really helps to
> > understand).
> >
> >
> > On 6/17/05, dan tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Guy,
> > >
> > > Move your integration/acception test to a separate maven project.
> > > Treat it like an application so that you can invoke it on demain.
> > > (ie all your test source goto src/main/java....)
> > >
> > > You many need to write some goal wrapper to invoke the test.
> > >
> > > -D
> > >
> > > On 6/17/05, Guy Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I'm currently using Maven 1 for running our regular unit tests.  However
> > > > I'm in the process of adding larger acceptance/integration tests that
> > > > cover wide areas of functionality.  I am still using the JUnit framework
> > > > for these acceptance tests, but I was wondering if there was a way to
> > > > separate out these two test types.
> > > >
> > > > The reason being is the time involved.  The standard unit tests run in
> > > > no more than a couple of minutes. However the new acceptance tests
> > > > require nearly an hour.
> > > >
> > > > Ideally, running these acceptance tests would be a different goal
> > > > (target).   I'm hoping to configure CruiseControl to run our unit tests
> > > > on each build, but only acceptance tests on builds greater than 3 or 4
> > > > hours apart.
> > > >
> > > > Is this possible with Maven?  Perhaps with version 2?  Or does this
> > > > require a custom plugin (based on the current unit test plugin)?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks much,
> > > > Guy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Craig McDaniel
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to