On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:14:15AM -0700, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > Ok, I can copy them in the repo > > hibernate 2.x to groupId net.sf.hibernate > hibernate 3.x to groupId org.hibernate > > ibatis 1.x to artifactId ibatis1 > ibatis 2.x to artifactId ibatis2
I don't think having different group ids is a good solution to this problem and probably just confusing to the users. I'm honestly not sure what the best solution is. Is it really possible to have both artifacts in the classpath at the same time? At least I would assume that this would depend on the ordering of the classpath. > > do you think this is the right way? Not sure, anybody else have a opinion? -- Trygve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
