+1
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
hibernate should be in different groupIds because they have changed
the package names.
On 7/8/05, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:14:15AM -0700, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Ok, I can copy them in the repo
hibernate 2.x to groupId net.sf.hibernate
hibernate 3.x to groupId org.hibernate
ibatis 1.x to artifactId ibatis1
ibatis 2.x to artifactId ibatis2
I don't think having different group ids is a good solution to this
problem and probably just confusing to the users. I'm honestly not sure
what the best solution is. Is it really possible to have both artifacts in
the classpath at the same time? At least I would assume that this would
depend on the ordering of the classpath.
do you think this is the right way?
Not sure, anybody else have a opinion?
--
Trygve
BodyID:254779857.2.n.logpart (stored separately)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
