There seem to be a few people working on a the docbook support right now. It would be good to see folks collaborating on a solution that covers everyone's needs.
- Brett On 10/24/05, Jose Gonzalez Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2005/10/24, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 13:27 +0200, Jose Gonzalez Gomez wrote: > > > > > Thanks a lot, I'll try to take a look at it as soon as possible. > > > Anyway, I've been taking a look at the head revision of > > > org.codehaus.doxia.module.docbook.DocBookParser.java, and I doubt that > > > this parser is going to generate anything close to useful. I had the > > > feeling that this class was copied from some other parser (maybe the > > > xdoc parser, as indicated in the header comment): most of the tags > > > used there are not part of the Docbook format, and there are some > > > commonly used tags missing. > > > > It's simplified docbook and is definitely geared toward site > > documentation, but decent PDFs can be produced. > > > > If you have existing tools that work with full docbook I would say stick > > with them. What's in Doxia is simplified docbook support. > > > I had a working docbook plugin for maven1 capable of generating HTML > output based on standard stylesheets, with resolution of links between > docbook documents. I'm thinking about porting it to maven2... I could > release it as open source if there's enough interest. > > Thanks, best regards > Jose > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
