Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31-01-2006 10:44:57:

> On 1/31/06, David Sag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'll deploy a snapshot, so you can follow the instructions on the 
maven
> > > website to use it.
> > >
> >
> > Okay that would be great.  Will you announce it to this list when you 
do
> > please?  I'll focus on something else until that point.
> 
> Yep, already done.
> 

ah thanks.  i guess i am stupid but i can't see it in 
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/
is there somewhere more specific in the maven website i should look? I 
looked in 
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/maven-plugins/maven-cobertura-plugin/ but 
the latest version there is 1.1.1 dated 5 dec 2005.
and there is no sign of it in 
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/

the version jason sent me was 2.0-SNAPSHOT


> > > I'm not sure on this one. Would need to boil it down to something 
simple
> > and
> > > reproducible to look at it I think.
> > >
> >
> > shall i raise a Jira issue?  Unfortunately I can't supply the pom.xml 
and
> > code I am using as it's internal to the EPO.
> 
> Yes, I meant if you could reproduce it with something similar to your
> build, without the variables.
> 

i'll try out the new cobertural plugin first.

> Do you know what versions of plugins you are using? A safe bet is to
> remove ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/plugins to ensure you are on
> the last releases.
> 

ok

> > > I suspect one of the other plugins is doing this (eg 
surefire-report?)
> > >
> >
> > hmm.  there's nothing non-standard about the way I generate my 
surefire
> > report so this is a bit of a mystery.
> 
> But surefire-report does invoke compile and test to generate the
> report - it has always done so. I thought you meant something was
> happening in addition to that?
> 

so site *does* invoke compile and test then.  for after all imho what use 
is the site without the surefire reports? 
Why does it need to do this though?  Surely if the tests have already been 
run and some sort of xml report has already been generated then the site 
report could simply transform that xml into a site with no need to 
recompile and run the tests.

Either way I probably need to bind checkstyle, pmd, findbugs etc to a 
phase other than compile then, perhaps verify.  Hmm will ponder this.

cheers

dave

Reply via email to