Are there any guidelines for choosing a groupId for a project?  It seems like 
there are several techniques on ibiblio and I think some of it has historical 
motivation.  
 
For example, the Jakarta Commons projects all seem to use a groupId that 
matches artifactId.  So you end up with commons-util/commons-util. I would have 
thought the groupId would have been "org.apache.jakarta" with artifactId 
"commons-util". 
 
The other question is: does the choice of groupId really matter?  Does it 
affect anything beyond helping people locate a dependency in the repository?  
 
K.C. 

Reply via email to