For us, it's more the latter - efficient use of the server.  We don't
mind if multiple check-ins are built at the same time.  Ideally
Continuum builds are executed only when requested.  That enables the
server on which Continuum runs to focus on other functions.

A side bonus of a trigger mechanism is that developers don't have to
wait a specified time interval + build time to validate their change.

-Chris


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: June 08, 2006 2:03 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Subversion post-commit hook

I know I'd find this useful as well, for several reasons:
-If you simply let continuum build every 5 mins, there could potentially
be more than 1 commit during that time, and you would be building
multiple revisions worth of changes. Ideally, you would want to build
once/revision so if the build breaks, you know which commit broke it.
-The continuum server would not be making as many hits to the svn
server. If you're building dozens and dozens of projects, this adds up
when it's once every 5 mins.

If you got rather fancy, it would sure be nice to have the commit check
if there were new projects added, and automagically add them to
continuum as well.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Carlos Sanchez
Sent: Thu 6/8/2006 1:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Subversion post-commit hook
 
why do you need that, setting a short period like 5 min is not enough?

On 6/8/06, Chris Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We'd like to trigger Continuum builds upon developer commits in
> Subversion.  It sounds like to do so we need to develop an xml-rpc
> client.
>
> Has anyone developed a post-commit hook into Continuum from
Subversion?
> Is there related documentation available?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Chris
>
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may
contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted
and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return
this
> by email and then delete it.
>
>


-- 
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
                             -- The Princess Bride

_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.

Reply via email to