On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > what's the problem? jetty:run? you can use war:inplace jetty:run
> >
> > Yeah, jetty6:run doesn't work. jetty6:run-war and jetty6:run-exploded
> > both seem to work fine, but don't pick up changes that I make/save in
> > my IDE.
>
>
> jetty6 was renamed to jetty
> It's mantained by Mortbay, I don't know if they'll be adding the war
> overlay feature to jetty:run. I was instructed to use the war:inplace
> jetty:run when overlaying wars.
>
> jetty:run-exploded works again the target dir so if you IDE don't copy
> the changed files there it won't work. You may configure it tough.
>
> >
> > Note: I say jetty6 vs. jetty b/c jetty6 actually works for me whereas
> > the jetty plugin seems to have issues with my project.
> >
> > I suppose war:inplace works, but I tend to stay away from that b/c it
> > copies files into your source tree and I've seen rookie developers
> > often get confused when they go to check things into source control.
> > If there was a war:inplace-clean, it might be more usable. However,
> > in something like AppFuse, where there will be .xml files overlayed
> > from another WAR - it might lead to a lot of confusion when folks use
> > war:inplace.
> >
> > Do you think the current directory/project structure I have in place
> > is a good one?
> >
> > appfuse2
> > - data
> > - common (model objects, interfaces)
> > - hibernate
> > - ibatis
> > - service
> > - web
> > - common
> > - common-war
> > - jsf
> > - jsf-war
> > - spring
> > - spring-war
> > - struts
> > - struts-war
> > - tapestry
> > - tapestry-war
> >
> > I'd rather not have framework and framework-war, but it seems it's
> > necessary for end users to get both base classes and static files with
> > the war-overlay feature.
>
> looks right. In m1 I think there was an option to add the classes as a
> jar to the war instead of copying them to web-inf/classes.
Really!? If this was added to M2, could I revert back to one WAR
project (removing the similar JAR) project? If so, I'd *really* like
to see this added, and of course, would be willing to try writing the
patch myself.
The config option is archiveClasses, at least in the latest war plugin in svn
Matt
> The problem is how wars work, it's pretty limited.
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> > >
> > > On 8/25/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > While the war-overlay feature appears to work pretty well, it doesn't
> > > > work at all with the jetty6 plugin. Is this a known issue? Are there
> > > > any plans to fix this, or should I talk to someone on a different
> > > > (jetty) mailing list?
> > > >
> > > > Without this feature, it doesn't seem that AppFuse can be a war
> > > > library, but rather will have to continue as a starter project w/ a
> > > > bunch of files in it by default.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > >
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/examples/war-overlay.html
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > -- The Princess Bride
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> -- The Princess Bride
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
