Re: Repository Policy

[Markus KARG]

Wendy Smoak schrieb:

On 9/20/06, diroussel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Now, I'm not a .NET expect, so correct me if I'm wrong. But according to the CLR book [1] one of the ways the CLR is better than the java JVM is the

handling of versions and version meta-data.

...

Does that make sense? Do people think a similar mechanism in maven would be

useful?

I'm not sure how much of it can be addressed by Maven vs. needing to
be done in the JVM itself, but you may want to keep an eye on JSR-277,
Java Module System:

  http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=277

I think JSR 277 discusses exactly what we need to solve our quarrel. Meanwhile, we should agree on accepting the current specifications (J2EE spec, MANIFEST.MF spec) as they are.

Markus

begin:vcard
fn:Markus KARG
n:KARG;Markus
org:QUIPSY QUALITY GmbH;Entwicklung / R & D
adr:;;Stuttgarter Strasse 23;Pforzheim;Baden-Wuerttemberg;75179;Bundesrepublik Deutschland
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Staatl. gepr. Inf.
tel;work:+49-7231-9189-52
tel;fax:+49-7231-9189-59
note:QUIPSY(R) Entwicklung / R & D
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.quipsy.de
version:2.1
end:vcard

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature