Where will I put dependnacy jars ?? which are required in my project. In Maven 1.0 we used to put all jar in local repository. in maven 2.0 is there any differene ?? so to refer any jar I need to put some where in repository correct .. and to use that I need to define group/artifact/version
Lets say I have 30 external jars in my project. so I need to create 30 folders and need to put each jar in seprate folder. In maven 1.0 we simply have one folder in repo and then we put all jars in jars folder. and maven understand dependancy using artificate name. that was more prefarable for me. I can see all jar of group in one directory. Max O Bowsher wrote: > > Harish Kachoria wrote: >> I mean to say, If I wants to use maven then I have to use in this way, I >> have >> to maintain version, but for my project maintaing of version is not a >> problem. and Management won't like Idea to have directory for each >> module. >> So if Maven is enough flexible then adoptation in any project becomes >> very >> easy. >> >> I was using maven 1.0 in my past project and was quite comfertable and >> because of this as a System designer I propose to use Maven in my current >> project. >> But with Maven 2.0 I'm trying to fit all my requirements from past 1 week >> but not suceed. >> now I'm very much frustrated. > > > The local repository is simply a cache, maintained by Maven. It's layout > should not influence your project in any way. > > Please explain why the layout of the local repository matters to you, or > is part of your requirements. > > > Max. > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/how-to-configure-Default-Repository-Layout-for-local-repository-tf4018468s177.html#a11416853 Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
