I had the this way working for a while using annotations like so:
@Suite.SuiteClasses( { ServicesSystemTestSuite.class })
@RunWith(Suite.class)
Using junit 4.2, but library conflicts and some transitive dependency on
junit 3.8 started causing errors.
So now I have reverted to the old way like so:
public static junit.framework.Test suite() {
TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
suite.addTestSuite(ServicesSystemTestSuite.class);
return suite;
}
On 9/12/07, Kalle Korhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I looked at it at one point and came to the same conclusion that there's
> no
> support for running suites. Wouldn't mind be proven wrong though.
>
> Kalle
>
>
> On 9/12/07, mfs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello Folks,
> >
> > Am looking into how having a suite in junit4 (or even earlier versions)
> > can
> > integrate with the way maven2 runs the junit test-cases, i mean if we
> are
> > using maven to run the test-cases, can having a suite make any
> > difference?...because maven eventually will be running all methods which
> > have @Test as a prefix (for Junit 4) or otherwise run methods with test
> as
> > prefix (for junit3 and earlier). Does sure-fire plugin has any support
> for
> > it ? doesnt seem so ?
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> >
> > Farhan.
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/suite-in-junit-and-maven-2---do-they-work-together-tf4430242s177.html#a12638433
> > Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
--
Sebastian Johnck
(415) 425 - 8361
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MotionBased Technologies
180 Harbor Dr.
Sausalito, CA 94965
www.motionbased.com
Coordinates:
N 37° 51' 33"
W 122° 29' 08"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
