this does not work because tomcat plugin not looks on the archive-name,
merely to the packaging type defined in the head of pom.xml.


Wayne Fay wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure if it would work, but could you use <finalName> to
> specify a .war, and leave <packaging> as type jar?
> 
> Wayne
> 
> On 9/28/07, aldana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> as described in post (see link
>> http://www.nabble.com/how-to-disable-implicit-plugin-execution-order-of-inherited-poms--tf4534393s177.html)
>> i cannot use the packaging type war, because inherited plugin execution
>> makes war packaging of axis2 app fail.
>>
>> my workaround is to use the packaging type jar, so plugin execution does
>> not
>> get inherited. unfortunately this makes tomcat plugin not run, because it
>> expects a packaging war (it skips with message 'Skipping non-war
>> project).
>>
>> does somebody know whether it is possible to use tomcat plugin though
>> packaging jar is set?
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/enable-plugins-for-other-packaging-types-tf4535051s177.html#a12942247
>> Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/enable-plugins-for-other-packaging-types-tf4535051s177.html#a12942672
Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to