Hi Emerson,

Nope, we don't have it (and now, I'll make sure no one add it in the future)
;-)

Erez.

On Dec 6, 2007 12:50 PM, emerson cargnin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Erez
>
> I presume you don't have any sub-project with a . on the name : )
>
> emerson
>
> On 05/12/2007, Erez Nahir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So am I.
> > Like every other 1.0-SNAPSHOT, there are things to improve, but still,
> > greate work.
> >
> > Erez.
> >
> > P.S. it works for us on a multi module project with no issues.
> >
> > On Dec 5, 2007 7:16 PM, Mick Knutson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > http://mojo.codehaus.org/dashboard-maven-plugin/index.html
> > > I love the plugin and it works great
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 5, 2007 6:00 AM, emerson cargnin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi guys, after a long while I got the dashboard to work, although
> the
> > > > usage page is really misleading. I put here (
> > > > http://echofloripa.blogspot.com/2007/12/maven2-dashboard-plugin.html)
> > > > a how-to on how make the basic feature of it to work, as in there
> the
> > > > plugin version is missing on the pom and on the dashboard maven
> > > > command. The dashboard plugin when using aggragate report, the link
> to
> > > > submodules doesn't work when they have a '.' on it. Aparently it
> gets
> > > > clipped after the dot.
> > > >
> > > > Also, I got a bit deceptive as I expected the site and dashboard
> > > > plugin to be stable enough in maven2. The site plugin for
> multimodules
> > > > projects don't work as expected/advertised, for example, the command
> :
> > > >
> > > > -mvn site:stage
> > > >
> > > > Alright that site:site doesn't work as m1, it's said in the faq
> also.
> > > > But the site:stage command, which the faq tells is the right way to
> > > > get the muilti-module site structure together. Well it just doesn't
> > > > happen and someone on the maven IRC channel said it has issues.
> > > >
> > > > Don't want to start fud here, I'm just a bit down as I've been
> > > > advertising a lot maven 2 to substitute maven1 where I work, using
> as
> > > > main arguments that maven 2 is much more stable and mature. But i
> see
> > > > it's not quite the case. I really hope I'm wrong.
> > > >
> > > > Emerson
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mick Knutson
> > >
> > > http://www.baselogic.com
> > > http://www.blincmagazine.com
> > > http://www.djmick.com
> > > http://www.myspace.com/mickknutson
> > > http://www.myspace.com/BLiNCMagazine
> > > http://tahoe.baselogic.com
> > > ---
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to